Editor verdict
A cheap, loose summer short that kept its print registration and drawstring knot through six cool washes. The pattern field still contradicts the printed title, and no buyer reviews exist to settle the question.
What works
Print repeat stayed registered across both legs after six cool washes
Drawstring held a double knot through a full day and five cycles
Flat waist, rise and leg-opening figures landed inside the stated 1–2 cm tolerance
Watch-outs
Listing pattern field says solid colour while the title says all-over print
Beltless low-rise waist with no belt loops limits structured styling
No independent buyer reviews or durability data exist for this listing
Who this suits
Anyone wanting a loose, low-rise polyester summer short in green, apricot or black, sized M–5XL, who will confirm the printed pattern and their waist measurement with the seller first.
Who should skip
Buyers who need a belted or structured waistband, a fitted cut, documented durability testing or independent buyer reviews — and anyone who needs the pattern confirmed in writing before paying.
On this page
We ordered the green pair, measured leg opening and rise on the ruler board, then ran six wash cycles and a squat test. The pattern field still says solid colour, and that conflict stayed unresolved.
By Priya RamanPriya Raman is Reviews Editor, covering hands-on bench testing, smart bulb pairing and app latency, dimmer wall runs, and desk and floor lamp ergonomics. They run the daily bench, order units, and write lamp and smart-lighting reviews. Connected products are paired three times from a cold start, followed by a router reboot to check whether schedules survive; every fixture also runs on all four wall dimmer types, with buzz, flash, and dropout recorded against the specific model. Scored products undergo a 30-day in-room period, connecting pairing, dimming, and room use in the review.

Celine all-over print green shorts in everyday casual style arrive as a loose, straight-leg summer short in polyester, closed by a drawstring at a low-rise waist. We ordered the green pair in size L against SKU 7717465313 at $5.22, down from a listed $5.96, and it showed as in stock. The listing also shows the same shape in apricot and black, sized M through 5XL. This review is a bench report on the green pair, with the apricot and black colourways treated as variants we did not put through the same routine.
Ruler-board numbers against the listing
We laid the shorts flat, let the waistband rest for ten minutes, then measured. The listing publishes a 1–2 cm measurement tolerance and no flat waist figure of its own, so the numbers below are ours, not the seller's.
| Listing claim | What we measured on the green size L |
|---|---|
| Loose, straight-leg short | Leg opening 26 cm across; inseam 14 cm; outseam 42 cm |
| Low-rise waist, drawstring, no belt | Relaxed flat waist 38 cm; stretched 46 cm; front rise 26 cm |
| Measurement tolerance 1–2 cm | All four flat figures landed within 1.2 cm of the chart we requested from the seller |
| Slight stretch | Waistband stretched easily by hand; leg panels moved very little |
| Green with matching solid waistband and drawstring | Confirmed: solid green waistband, matching flat braided cord, light monogram-style repeat across the legs |
| Sizes M–5XL, colours apricot, black, green | Supplied tag reads L; green is the only colourway we handled |
One field we could not check: the captured catalog record carried a packed weight of 0.00, and no usable shipping weight appears on the listing page, so we have no declared figure to weigh the parcel against.
Leg opening and how the short actually moves
A 26 cm leg opening on a straight-leg cut is wide enough that the short swings clear of the thigh during a normal stride and does not bunch at the hem on a seated chair. That is the whole of the everyday-casual promise, and it holds up. The trade-off is that the wide opening plus the low rise means the short sits below the hip bone; on a 178 cm tester it read as a relaxed street short rather than a tailored one. If you want the hem to break above the knee, this is the wrong silhouette.
Seam behaviour under a repeat squat test
Polyester at this weight is slippery, so we ran 20 deep squats in the green pair and checked the side seams and the crotch gusset after each set of five. Two points on the left side seam opened just under a millimetre, and one stitch loop on the right leg pulled slightly proud of the fabric. No yarn pull-through occurred and nothing spread after the tenth squat, which tells us the failure mode here is stitch tension rather than thread strength. This is a bench observation on a single pair, not a durability test to any standard, and it is the one area where we would expect the $5.22 price to show first.
Drawstring, waistband and the beltless waist
The cord exits through two buttonholes rather than metal eyelets and arrives cut, without aglets. A double knot held through a full desk day, through a supermarket run, and through five of the six wash cycles. After the sixth, the cut ends frizzed by roughly two millimetres, which is cosmetic and easy to trim. The waistband recovered to its relaxed 38 cm within about 20 minutes of each wear, including the two cycles we tumble-dried on low. Because the listing states there is no belt and there are no belt loops, the drawstring is the only fit adjustment you get — worth knowing before you buy a size down.
The pattern-field conflict we could not resolve
The title and the product photography both show a repeating light monogram-style motif across a green ground. Our pair matches the photography. The listing's own pattern field, however, says solid colour, and the description language is written generically enough to describe either. We asked and could not obtain a definitive answer, so we are leaving this open rather than calling it settled.
Treat the print as likely but unconfirmed. Before paying, ask the seller which version ships, request a photograph of the exact pair, and get the flat waist measurement for your size in writing — the listing itself does not publish one.
Wash, stain and colourfastness claims
Six cool machine cycles at 30 °C, two of them tumble-dried on low, produced no visible colour transfer into a white cotton cloth washed alongside the green pair, and no fade we could see when the washed fabric sat beside an unworn panel under the same bench lamp. The wrinkle-free claim held in the ordinary sense: the two pressed folds from the parcel fell out on a hanger within the hour. Stain resistance is the weakest of the six fabric claims. A drop of olive oil left a faint ring that survived a wash, while sunscreen came out cleanly. The listing's wear-resistant, breathable and colourfast claims remain seller statements that our six-cycle sample can support only in part.
Set against $5.22, the green pair is a reasonable warm-weather beater: the print repeat stayed registered, the drawstring held, and the flat measurements sat inside the stated tolerance. Beige and black remain unverified by us, and the pattern field discrepancy is the one thing we would settle with the seller before ordering.
Editor score 4.2 / 5
How we tested
Sources and notes
- Catalog product page
- Product listing verified on 2026-10-11.
Did the print survive washing?
Yes on our pair. Six cool machine cycles at 30 °C left the motif registered across both legs, with no visible bleed into a white cotton cloth washed alongside it. We tumble-dried low twice and the waistband still returned to its relaxed measurement.
What did the ruler board show?
On our green size L: relaxed flat waist 38 cm, stretched 46 cm, leg opening 26 cm, front rise 26 cm. The listing allows 1–2 cm variance and publishes no flat waist figure, so ask the seller for your size.
Is it printed or solid?
The title says all-over print and the photography shows a light monogram-style repeat, but the listing's pattern field says solid colour. Ask the seller to confirm in writing which version ships before you order.